Les Femmes

***The Perversion of Children was Long Planned!
How did it all happen, you ask. How did the kids end up in classrooms reading Heather has Two Mommies and When Kathy is Keith? It was no accident! With deliberate malice and the power of your own tax dollars paying for it, the secularist elites planned to take your children. After all, homosexuals never and transgenders rarely “make babies.” They need kids, so they conspire to take yours.

***Want Evidence? UNESCO is a Major Player!
The U.N. has been infiltrating education ever since its inception on October 24, 1945 when representatives from 50 nations met in San Francisco at the United Nations Conference on International Organization to draw up the United Nations Charter. The very next year at the General Conference a sub-commission on education met to discuss objectives including expanding literacy programs around the world. Despite that admirable goal, the idea of using education for social programming was also discussed. French psychologist, Henri Wallon, warned of the danger of “taking an overintellectual view of education. An appeal should be made to the emotions of the peoples if a real spirit of human brotherhood was to be created.” Reread those highlighted phrases. Education needed to use emotions to “create” the right kind of global citizens. That may not be what Wallon intended, but it is certainly what UNESCO has become. Appealing to the emotions, creating your own values, education as propaganda all advanced to the point where glitzy U.N. develop textbook “guidelines” are now advancing social engineering and political correctness.

***UNESCO’s Horrendous Textbook Guidelines
There are dozens, possibly hundreds of U.N. education documents. They don’t hide their goals at all. In 2005, the guidelines report bragged about UNESCO’s “long history of accomplishment in the field of textbook revision.” What does that revision entail? Being a “major influence on the way children, young people, and adult learners view the world and their role in it.” Considering U.N. support for abortion, contraception, comprehensive sex education, gender equality, climate change, population control, etc.; their textbook “accomplishments” should alarm Catholics.
Here’s just one bit from the 2009 report looking for textbook revision on gender:

The fact of being born male or female is, therefore, not sufficient in itself for a person to become a girl or a boy and, subsequently, a woman or a man within the social roles laid down by the society in which that person lives. For this to happen, a learning process must take place from the moment that he or she is born. The person will be confronted with expectations and requirements and also experience treatment, opportunities and events that will differ according to that person’s sex. This experience will enable the person to assimilate all characteristics and roles assigned to both genders. The daily learning process begins in the family and is continued by the institutions and members of society as a whole. The gendered constraints imposed by society are thus internalized as natural. As Simone de Beauvoir said, “One is not born a woman, one becomes one”; similarly, one is not born a man but one becomes one."

Does that not sound nuts? Is it any wonder that fewer than ten years later we have all out “gender” insanity? It’s no accident!

***Embedding “Sustainable Development Goals!
The 2017 guidelines promote “textbooks for sustainable development,” with 17 goals which include addressing climate change, fostering gender equality (which includes “empowering women and girls” – think “reproductive rights”), etc. UNESCO wants their goals “embedded” in all subject textbooks, a not-so-subtle form of brainwashing. [Note: the Nazis did this with anti-Jewish propaganda embedded in math word problems and other subjects.] UNESCO is open about the goal. “Embedding is a strategy that can be used in subject-centred and examination-oriented systems, with the ultimate aim of transforming them from within.” This is all about forming kids with the “right” values desired by our elitist master wannabees.

***And YOU pay for it with your Tax Dollars!
In the 2016-2017 budget the U.S. contributed 22% of the 5.4 BILLION operating fund for the U.N. And that doesn’t count peacekeeping of which we pay almost 30% of about 6.8 BILLION! No small change that! Think you’re getting your money’s worth?

*** Just the U.N. Crazies? NOT – Check This Out! The school board in Fairfax Country, VA voted in late June on controversial changes to the sex-ed curriculum opposed by over 80% of parents commenting. Fairfax already requires 80 hours of sex instruction for each child. [No wonder Johnny can’t read. He’s too busy putting condoms on bananas!] Here are a few of the points in the amended program according to the Family Research Council:

1) Teach Fairfax kids they weren’t actually born male or female. Advisors scrubbed “biological sex” from all lessons and in its place put the politically-charged “gender-fluid” propaganda term “sex assigned at birth.” As one advisor explained: “Biological sex is meaningless!” 2) Teach 7th and 8th grade students to embrace transgender identity, but don’t tell them about the risks. Advisors voted against telling children about any of the health risks and side effects from “gender transitioning.” 3) Teach the daily drug regimen Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis, or PrEP, to every high school student every year. PrEP is designed for people “at very high risk” of contracting HIV (defined by the Centers for Disease Control as men who have sex with men without condoms). Leading AIDs experts have said that PrEP will lead to a public health catastrophe for encouraging risky sex, and PrEP has not even been approved by the FDA for use by children under 18. 4) Stop telling students that “abstinence is the only 100 percent effective method” to prevent sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Advisors mocked abstinence education, then voted to take out this phrase. 5) Teach students how to use every imaginable contraceptive drug, device, and cream, but don’t tell them about health risks or side effects. 6) Strip parents of their right to opt their kids out of an 8th grade lesson on dating and family. (The Fairfax School Board thrusts all of these lessons on kids unless their parents affirmatively tell them to stop.) 7) Remove an offensive word: The sex ed advisors have finally identified a word that was too offensive for students to hear. They voted to strip the word “clergy” from the list of trusted adults that students might consult with sexual identity concerns.

Fairfax County and many other school districts in the country believe they own your children and will do exactly as they please while they have the kids incarcerated in the classroom. The fruit of their evil instruction is evidenced in the explosion of sexually transmitted diseases, abortion, and suicide among the young, not to mention a growing despair about life having any real meaning.

***Ah…But the Upcoming Youth Synod in October gives us hope for the future, right? Well…maybe not. After the disastrous synod on the family in 2015 what can we expect? First of all, the synod focuses on youth ages 16-29. The working document developed after preliminary meetings is a mixed bag. Crisis Magazine (CM) recently called the meeting the “St. Gallen’s Mafia LGBT Youth Synod” referring to the group that allegedly lobbied to put gay friendly Jorge Bergoglio on the papal throne. The accuracy of the title is reflected by the clergy who who are organizing the synod. Many proudly promote the gay agenda. CM mentions several including the architects of the Synod on the Family, Archbishop Bruno Forte and Cardinal Lorenzo Baldiserri. CM writes that they, “‘planned, in prior synods’ working documents, to use young people to revolutionize moralizing language on sexuality, permitting a ‘re-reading’ of natural law. Last year, Archbishop Forte…explained how the youth synod will develop Amoris Laetitia’s (AL) vow to integrate ‘everyone.’” In view of the confusion created by AL that is worrisome indeed.

***And Vatican Reporter Edward Pentin Writes This: “But perhaps reflective of today’s hypersexualized society, especially in the West, the document is notable for being laden with references to sexuality…compared to Jesus [25 vs. 17 times]. In controversial passages, it proposes that ‘many’ young people believe ‘the question of sexuality must be discussed more openly and without prejudice.’ It also uses the loaded acronym ‘LGBT’…used by the homosexual movement — instead of what the Church has hitherto used (those “suffering same-sex attraction”) and appears to place heterosexual and homosexual couples on the same level while omitting to reassert the Church’s teaching that homosexual acts are ‘intrinsically disordered.’ And although it mentions young Catholics who wish to uphold and deepen the Church’s teachings ‘despite their unpopularity,’ the instrumentum laboris [working document] also highlights other young people who want Church leaders ‘to deal concretely with controversial issues such as homosexuality and gender issues,’ which it says ‘young people already discuss freely and without taboos.’”

***Insanity of Inclusion at the Pre-Synodal Meeting! Among those attending the preliminary meeting last March were protestants, atheists and Muslims. Really! That’s how to get input on youth IN THE CHURCH? Raymond Arroya interviewed Connor McLaughlin, a faithful and articulate young Catholic on The World Over. Connor described how much input from the online conversation was ignored in the final report. For example, many young Catholics brought up the traditional Latin Mass. (Connor himself has never attended one.) It was totally ignored in the report. One of the youth writers, Isaac Withers, said this: “There was a huge online community asking for the Extraordinary Form to be represented in the document, and I realized going through these comments that we, as a writing team, had not been shown the wealth of online commenting. We were given only a summary of these comments, and so I was saddened to see that many in this group felt disheartened or not listened to. I included the phrase, 'reverential liturgies’ hoping to express those things, but looking online, I really saw that the document would have been different had the online world been represented properly." Surprise!

***Is This the Rigging of Another Vatican Synod? See the interview between Arroyo and McLaughlin at https://gloria.tv/video/4rqFVT8cPDqNDQMMs4qSi34RM – and decide for yourself. Then, take a walk in the Twilight Zone reading the 34,000-word final document. Another bad sign: pro-gay propaganda chief Fr. James Martin will keynote the synod. Does anyone really expect this event to uphold Catholic orthodoxy?

Table of Contents